Randomn3ss » Internet

Make Money with Twitter

Mike Panic — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:36:39 +0000

Going back to the early 90′s when I first started to heavily use the Internet I wanted to make money doing it. Back then I used it to get mailing addresses for a small business I had going in High School and wanted to mail out a sales flyer to generate sales via phone, it worked. In the late 90′s I remember All Advantage, a pay to surf the web tiered affiliate program. Shortly thereafter I started to build websites and the rest has kind of been a blur. It seems everything on the web can be monetized, Twitter is just another means to make some money for those who use it.

Back in the summer of 2007 I joined Twitter and while four and a half years isn’t very long, it’s forever ago in technology times. The micro blogging service was quirky and no one really had any full understanding as what they were supposed to do with it. It wasn’t long before I asked WTF was I thinking using Twitter? and vowed never to update it again. Well, I have, and a lot. By 2008 I was finding useful reasons to use it and for all intensive purposes, it’s a staple in my tech life and virtually everyone I know. Twitter is so large now that I see TV commercials who no longer advertise their website or even Facebook page anymore, they are simply promoting the use of a #hashtag, this goes for major networks too.

Just over three months ago I joined SponsoredTweets, a site that links advertisers and tweeters together. The company has some very high profile celebrities and some quick searching on Google made everything here seem pretty legit. You fill out a short profile, including tags of things that both interest you and that you talk about on a regular basis. Based on the date you joined Twitter, the number of followers you have in relation to the number you follow and a few other specifications, SponsoredTweets suggests a price for you per tweet. When I initially signed up I had about 920 followers and it’s suggest price per tweet for me was $1.27 based on the tags I chose. When an offer comes in, you can accept or deny it, then use the given guidelines to write a tweet which will both include a link to what the advertiser wants and a disclaimer of your choosing, such as #ad, Ad:, #sponsored and a few others to indicate this is indeed an affiliate link. When you accept and write your tweet it’s then sent for review by the advertiser, if they approve it SponsoredTweets will automatically tweet for you within a given time frame that the sponsor chooses. Provided a few people click the links, you’ll get paid. Wanting to actually see if I could make money, I set my asking price to $1.00 and waited for offers from advertisers to come in. The site also has an available advertisers section that will show several lower paying offers, sometimes as low as $0.05. These offers pay per click when they get tweeted as opposed to the pay per campaign method when you set the price. If you get 40 clicks on a link at $0.05 you’ll make $2.00. Because I couldn’t wait to see if any offers would come in I took a few of these lower paying offers ranging from $0.05 to $0.15 per click and saw an average of 2-10 clicks per campaign. It’s important to note that I only chose ads that I think people who follow me would be interested in reading.

SponsoredTweets actually doubles your price per campaign and that’s what they charge the advertisers, so an advertiser would have to pay $2.00 if they wanted me to tweet something. After a month and a few successful programs I saw my suggested price to charge per tweet jump to $1.98, so I adjusted my price up to $1.50 and found that a full week went by without an offer. I changed it again to $1.25 and got one offer the following week then moved it back down to $1.00 and the offers started to flood in again. My suggested price after being with the program for three months is $2.93 however I’m still sticking with $1.50 because I feel I get more offers at this price range and an advertiser is more likely to spend $3 several times with me than $6 once.

So the nitty-gritty, am I making money? Well my Twitter account is up to 1,003 followers at the time of writing, I’ve done several dozen sponsored tweets and made just about $30. The payout threshold is $50 although they allow withdraw prior to that for a $2 penalty. Total time invested is maybe 10 minutes per month and at $10 per month my actual pay rate is $1 per minute or $60 per hour. I’m fine with that ratio and will continue to use SponsoredTweets for the future.

How has the reaction been? Actually, it’s been pretty favorable. I made a disclaimer tweet when I signed up so my followers would know I was doing this and have actually had some really good @replies to the tweets, mostly because I stick to computer, technology, entertainment and photography sponsored tweets, which is what I’m tweeting about all the time anyway. I’ve not changed any other aspect of my tweeting habits but am aware that the more followers I have, the more interaction I get, the better the chances are an advertiser will choose to use me.

Sign up for SponsoredTweets now and give them a try, this actually is not paid for by them. Follow me on Twitter @mikepanic.Similar articles that might also interest you:

The Morning Call Newspaper Charges for Online Content, Will Fail Fast

Mike Panic — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:49:22 +0000

My local newspaper, The Morning Call which is owned by the Tribune Company, publishers of The Chicago Times and the LA Times, among other has announced it will be changing it’s online terms to paid content. It’s been nearly two months since the move was announced, but with the end of the free versions of online content readers are starting to become outraged. I’m going to make an attempt to point out why this is not only a bad idea but one that will ultimately bring an end to my local newspaper.

Full disclaimer, I get paid to write articles for other sites, I understand nothing in life can be free and those who create work, tangible or not, should be compensated. Randomn3ss has been a passion of mine for years as a way to explore my own writing and more specifically in this case, there is no option on The Morning Call’s website to leave comments for the article, which I find odd, so I’ll rebut it all here, piece by piece.

The Morning Call’s publisher is quoted as saying,

the decision to begin charging for digital content is based on readers’ strong demand for local news, features and sports on the Internet and mobile devices

That’s fine, but it’s been free since at least 1996, the earliest date the Wayback Machine has a cache of. So to establish a timeline, that’s 15 years of publishing content online. In those 15 years we as a society have drastically changed how we choose to read and consume material and now have more options than ever. It is not the readers’ strong demand for content, it’s more a matter of how we want that content, and when we want to read it.

The article goes on to boast some rather impressive stats, including a 62% spike in page views from 2005 to 2010, of which I don’t attribute much to the website as I do to how we consume our information. It’s faster, easier and more likely for the large majority of readers to consumer information at their jobs, either at lunch or on company time than it is to get up early and read a paper at the breakfast table. Readers are also more likely to read more articles in a digital version because each article contains links to other articles. Some more impressive stats are mentioned, like August 2011′s page views at 18 million. These are important numbers.

As the article continues, the publisher gets on his soap box and spouts some crap about how amazing it is that the growth is due in part to the in-depth local news coverage and that forthcoming they intend to provide readers with innovative new ways to read content and get weather on whatever device they want to. Right here is part of the ignorance that will bury The Morning Call. More on this in a minute.

When The Morning Call switches to paid content, non-paying readers will only be able to see 10 pages per month.

Directly quoting from the article:

A drop in revenue from print advertising helped drive the trend to charge for content, as well as the realization that advertising based on Web page views cannot sustain independent local journalism, especially in a bad economy, said Ford Risley, head of the journalism program at Penn State University.

Risley noted that news gathering is a labor-intensive and expensive business.

This is an interesting note, because the economy was great in 1996, even after the dot com bust of the 2000′s it was still great. What’s really going on here is that The Tribune is using The Morning Call as a guinea pig to see if paid content will work on their larger newspapers.

Aside from shifts in technology and advancements in how we consume information, The Morning Call, under control of The Tribune has always been a step or five behind where it needs to be. Wikipedia reports daily readers of printed material around 94,000 and Sunday’s paper at 121,000. That’s actual papers delivered to paying customers. The people I know who personally pay for the paper rarely actually read it, much less the entire thing.

The newspaper industry has, up until 20 years ago, had free reign on profits and margins, double dipping if you will. They charge advertisers based on the number of subscriptions they have and charge the consumers for the content, which is then laden with advertisements. No one has successfully done this with a website that supplies news and that is because unlike start-up’s and venture capitalists out of Silicon Valley, no one in the publishing world ever listens to what the consumers want.

The Morning Call’s website has always been out-dated, poorly laid out and riddled with horrible advertisements. The latest version of the site is designed around a fairly friendly 980 pixel width, happy to suit most peoples computers. Ads crammed on both sides of the body of most articles bring the actual content readability down to just 362 pixels. This article has no less than 14 ads on it, not including more ads linking to internal The Morning Call articles that are not related at all to the content of the story. The page is so heavy with ads that even on my FiOS Internet connection it takes almost 6 seconds to fully load everything, watching all the ads load in the status bar of Firefox for confirmation.

A key to generating revenue from any website via affiliate marketing or ad sales is to not only target the consumer but to not forget that they first came to your site to read the information. The Morning Call is making it difficult to actually read the articles, regardless of their high traffic rates.

Taking a look at the numbers, 100,000 subscriptions to the printed version means that roughly 1 in 8 people from The Lehigh Valley subscribe to the paper, an amazing accomplishment, one that really couldn’t be much better in my eyes. Then you look at the 18 million page views. The rough math says that every single person in The Lehigh Valley viewed about 23 pages of The Morning Call’s website that month. That number is astounding. Anyone running a commercial website would be thrilled with these numbers, yet The Morning Call says they are broke and now need to charge for online content. They are broke because they have poor delivery of online content and can’t make ad revenue stick, that’s the real reason.

Constant change to the newsprint and online version of the site has left readers wondering where articles can be found, and how can they find them. The website is confusing for the older generation who are moving from print to digital. The photo galleries are horrible, forcing one to view a single photo at a time then click the dreaded next button, in some cases 20 or 30 times to see all the photos. This is done to increase the page views but it hinders the user experience, greatly. The lack of moderation in the comments is appalling, especially in cases where people have passed away due to causes other than natural death. Viewing The Morning Call on a mobile phone or tablet is painful because the web designers didn’t integrate browser awareness technology which would know I’m on an iPhone and adjust automatically for me, instead I need to remember to go to mobile.mcall.com. This is especially annoying when following @mcall on Twitter and clicking a link from my phone, again the normal site is so ad-heavy that it’s nearly impossible to actually get to the content and because the site isn’t smart enough to push me to the mobile version, I’m left with a bad experience. This doesn’t even touch on the horrible Twitter practice that The Morning Call has where it primarily act as a talker, using Twitter to deliver the new articles on the site, not writing actual tweets of interest and rarely engaging with their audience.

My personal feelings is that The Morning Call can and will see the same decrease in numbers as when Mayfair moved from a free event to a paid event. Furthermore, no where does it say that if I pay for a digital subscription will it be ad free. I wouldn’t mind paying a few bucks if the content was ad free, or if there wasn’t equally as good and free content out there. You’ll see a huge spike in sites like WFMZ and Lehigh Valley Live, without a doubt they will benefit from The Tribunes poor choice.

What if anything can fix this? The Tribune needs to stop treating the Internet like a printed paper and hire some consultants and more importantly, bring a few qualified user experience people in to redesign a site that is better for the readers. Take the focus off selling ads and back to providing readable quality content, after that the click-through rate of the ads that remain will drastically increase.Similar articles that might also interest you:

Social Networking is the New Customer Service

Mike Panic — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:46:15 +0000

Up until a few years ago if you had a problem, concern, question or wanted to give feedback to a company there were three primary ways of contacting them: in person, on the phone and email. Sure you could write a letter and slap a stamp on it, but why waste the trees. Live chat is sometimes available for online companies but it’s often staffed by people who aren’t familiar enough to help you or they are offline. All of these events are hidden, that is, only you and the company can see the correspondences and the likelihood a company simply ignores you is even higher. The last two years or so have given consumers a new way to publicly convey their gripes (and praises) with companies: social networking. The two biggest and most powerful ways are of coarse Facebook and Twitter.

Recently, I had my socks blown off with just how good and on-top of their customer base two companies are when I had some issues. First was a concern with LendingTree.com:

So, kind of obvious I went to their site, signed up for their free service and was expecting to get some offers and talk with someone about my mortgage. Their site told me I’d be capped to five lenders. I can deal with five, no big deal. What I couldn’t deal with was the insistent phone calls that started about 30 seconds after I hit submit. I should have screen captured my phones recent missed call list, but 22 total missed calls, some lenders calling 4 or 5 times two minutes apart. It left a bad taste in my mouth and something I totally wasn’t expecting. Rather than writing an email to them via their site, I wanted to publicly tell them I wasn’t satisfied, and also to let people who follow me know that if they were thinking about signing up, they could be in for a world of pain. After finding them on Twitter I sent the message above. To my surprise they got back to me fairly quickly:

While I can appreciate their sense of humor, I couldn’t deal with the rude voice mails, the non-stop calling and overall disruption to my life. I wanted to review the offers they had already emailed to me before I started to sit down and talk to each on the phone to find out my options, but there is no stop the calling option on the LendingTree website, so I replied:

To my surprise again, another quick reply:

LendingTree went to my website, listed on my Twitter profile and contacted me via the form there (I don’t have my email listed). AC turned out to be the initials of their Social Media Director who apologized and asked for a list of the numbers who have been calling and said she’d notify them I no longer wanted phone calls and asked what else she could do to help. Sure enough, the calls stopped. Additionally, she followed up a few days later to inquire if I was happy with the service and could find a loan to fit my needs. A+ for customer service here.

A few nights later I was at Wegmans grocery store, which I’ve ranted about in the past. I had come across a coupon for seasonal Silk Soy milk and of the three main grocery stores close to me knew Wegmans would be the sure-fire bet to have them. $1 off two 1-pint containers of any combination Mint Chocolate, Pumpkin Spice or Nog, and I honestly wanted all three. To my surprise, they had none! Not even a place holder on the shelf because they sold out. Every other Silk Soy milk option, but not these seasonal options. Once again I turned to Twitter, in part to let complain / question, but also to let my local followers know there wasn’t any available at the local grocery.

Thinking maybe one of my local followers would confirm or deny another store having stock didn’t happen, but again to my surprise Wegmans replied within two and a half hours:

I thanked them for looking into it, and figured they found my local store by the location in my Twitter profile. Less than 24 hours after they acknowledged my complaint they provided me with an answer:

Social networking customer service from Wegmans gets an A+.

With Wegmans, I happened to be in the store somewhat late shopping and tracking down a sales associate would have taken a while, I didn’t need to have it and was in small hurry to get home. Choosing to leave a message publicly, as stated, was to also let fellow local shoppers know and to see if anyone had a rebuttal. It was faster and far easier to fire up the Twitter client on my phone than to actually call the store and talk with someone, again because I didn’t need to have the item that night. Same can be said for contacting via email / their website.

Companies ranging in all sizes are utilizing social media not only to advertise their goods and services, but as a new form of interaction and communication with their customers. More and more I see companies using tag-lines in their advertisements asking consumers to like us on Facebook instead of actually listing their own website. While I firmly believe most businesses need to have a social networking presence, I more importantly believe they need to be properly staffed with knowledgeable people in the field. Clearly Wegmans and LendingTree have taken steps to ensure their name won’t be totally run through the mud by their customers and things can and will stay positive for them. Simply having a Twitter account or a Facebook fan page isn’t enough, having positive and productive interaction is key to a successful social networking and, customer service for your company.

Follow me on Twitter for more random rants, fun photos and silly experts: twitter.com/mikepanic

Similar articles that might also interest you:

Netflix Admits Mistake, Offers 1-time Credit

Mike Panic — Fri, 15 May 2009 13:25:52 +0000

For nearly two years now I’ve been a Netflix member, during that time I’ve only had one really bad experience with an otherwise flawless company. My problem was a DVD that arrived in two pieces, mailed it back and got another one in two pieces, mailed that one back and the third one showed up in 5 pieces. Ready to give up, I marked it as damaged and returned it to finally get an in tact disc, sadly the movie was terrible. In any event, their system just works.

Several months ago I showed you how to stream movies from your Mac to your TV and that’s how I’ve been enjoying the vast majority of movies from Netflix as of late, even reducing my plan down to the 1 disc at a time deal as I can fill the void between sending and receiving movies by streaming them. Streaming works great on my FiOS broadband connection and I rarely have any issues, except for the night before last.

Not thinking anything of it, I passed it off as a glitch in the Netflix servers and went on with my evening. I was pretty happy when I opened my email last night to see this:

How nice of them. A company admits they had a problem and offers a discount without me even contacting them. This may be a reason why Netflix stock trades at about $37 a share right now and other companies, like GM for example are hovering closer to $1.Similar articles that might also interest you:

Cable is dead to me!

Mike Panic — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:29:57 +0000

This is a guest post by Keith Lemery, a professional chef, network administrator, husband and father. It was written to compliment and follow up the complete list of of websites to stream full tv shows and movies from.

Several months ago my wife and I decided to cancel our Time Warner cable television service. We had the digital cable package with DVR, remote, and HD Tier. All together this package cost us just around $100 per month. We then added a Netflix subscription for $8.99 per month, which includes mailed DVDs, as well as unlimited streaming. This reduced our overall television bill by at least $80 per month, or almost $1000 per year!

I had been dabbling with internet television for a while. Hulu, Justin.tv, TV.com and NBC.com on my iPhone. When we made the switch, it was a little awkward, but after some tweaks, we don’t miss cable at all, and if anything, wonder why we hadn’t made the switch sooner!

Here is our setup:

A four year old Toshiba A55-S106 laptop, hooked up to our 32″ Westinghouse HDTV, via the SVGA out port. This cable I had bought on eBay a couple years ago for less than $5. To do this on a Mac, check out Mike’s article utilizing Understudy and Front Row.

My iPhone serves as a remote control. I am using Air Mouse Pro by RPA Tech, Inc. which is available on the iPhone App Store for $5.99. It controls the laptop by using the iPhone as a touchpad and also has a soft keyboard.

When opening FireFox, three tabs open up. Yahoo.com, Hulu.com, and NetFlix.com. I could add any number of channels we watch, NBC, CBS, Disney, but these suffice on startup.

Hulu is amazing. We have several subscriptions to programs we watched regularly on television. We usually DVR’d the programs to watch at a later time, so the fact that the programs are posted to Hulu a day or two after showing doesn’t bother us in the least.

As for NetFlix, we keep our DVD queue active, and use the unlimited streaming feature to it’s fullest. I subscribe to the NetFlix new release RSS, so I get updates of new releases on my iPhone through Google Reader. When I see a program or movie I like, I open the Phone Flix iPhone application, and add it to my queue. It’s a seamless process. Something I never imagined I would be doing a year ago.

Local channels and programming is somewhat hit or miss, but most new televisions can pick up local HD channels. There are some great YouTube videos on building your own HD antenna from coat hangers if you are out of range as we are, but the only thing we ever watched locally was the news.

I don’t miss the …coming up after the break cliffhangers and three minute commercial segments at all. I can easily check the web for local news if I have the desire.

My wife and I have no intention of ever going back to paid cable service, ever. It seems that soon enough all television networks will have an internet presence, if they don’t already, and will put most if not all of their programming online as ad revenue for online programming increases.

And the best part of all, we can watch an hour long program in around 41 minutes, and a half hour program in 21. So roughly 30% of the time a program is on is given to advertising. Sure, Hulu has commercials, but they are usually 15 to 25 seconds.

We are really enjoying having all of this control over what we watch, as well as the savings. For us it was a simple decision, one that we should have made a long time ago.

How about you? Are you still paying for cable television? Could you use the extra $1000 a year savings?Similar articles that might also interest you:

My internet is faster than yours

Mike Panic — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:55:28 +0000

OK maybe it is and maybe it isn’t, but two weeks ago I had really fast internet installed. The background is, when I bought my home, the only negative aspect besides not having a garage was the lack of true high-speed internet. I’ve been suffering for more than two years with one-way cable. For those who don’t know, that means I had about a 2 megabits per second (Mbps) download speeds (download rates of about 200 kb/s) and a dial-up modem for my uploads. Yes, a dial-up modem to send emails, attachments, upload content to FTP servers, etc. Not only was it archaically slow, it was hardly reliable. There was no other option because the cable run through the house was 35 years old and wouldn’t handle cable internet and I live about one half mile too far out to get DSL service, which would require a phone line anyway.

For the last 2 years or so my community has been trying to rally Verizon to bring in DSL, gaining over 50 signatures and sending them in, they seemed to have cared less. A few of us even talked with a local interent service provider about bringing in one really fast commercial connection and sharing it but the cost to build the infrastructure was insane, as were the monthly costs. All of this changed at the end of April.

I came home from a typical day of work and noticed spray painted lines in my front yard, my neighbors had them too, and some had white and blue as well. While walking my dog I asked my one retired neighbor what was up, he said we were getting new internet and pointed to a small trailer with what appeared to be orange stuff wrapped around it down the street. I walked down; sure as shit it was fiber! Over the next nearly 3 months, workers came and went, running fiber optic cable underground and then up to each of our houses. A notice on my door from Verizon said they were installing FiOS, and they would follow up when service was available. I naively thought it would take 4-6 weeks to do; it was closer to three and a half months till the service was available.

About three weeks ago while walking Bella before work I ran into a neighbor who said Fios internet was finally available and they were coming to install it at his house in 30 minutes. By the time I got home from work, he was hooked up with one of the fastest packages they offered and loving life. I called to subscribe to one of the lower cost packages offering 10/2, that is 10Mbps down and 2Mbps up and had them come the following Saturday morning. Install was about four hours long and everything is neatly tucked away in my utility closet. When installation was done, they setup the wireless router that comes with the service for free, this took less than 5 minutes and I was online.

Real world speed tests indicate that I have blazingly fast internet. How fast? This week I’ve been watching 480p HD TV shows on Hulu.com while downloading music and shows via bittorrent and have yet to see a single show skip or buffer. I also downloaded a 1.7gb file in just less than 25 minutes. But what about numbers? Check out the speed test I did last night to confirm just how fast my internet is.

I checked several servers and all showed speeds faster than 10Mbps and about the same upload, so I’m getting everything I’m paying for. Now that I finally have a real internet connection, I’m looking into the Netflix Roku and / or building a computer / buying a Mac mini to hook up to my Plasma to stream TV, act as a DVR and be a multimedia center. I’m also kicking around the idea of putting a network video camera in my home so I can watch my dog while I’m at work or away.

Dollar for dollar I’m actually saving about $10 / month with FiOS as I don’t need or use my home telephone line anymore and the craptastic one-way cable has also been canceled. If and when Verizon installs FiOS in your area, I’d hop on it. For those who do serious downloading, they offer a 50/20 connection [at least in my area] that can be had for around $150 / month. That’s 34 times faster than a commercial grade T1!Similar articles that might also interest you:

Web Fun That’s Oh So Green

Elizabeth Grecco — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:52:33 +0000

Yippee yay, it’s earth day!

Earth day was created in 1970 as a global environmental awareness initiative. It is now observed in 175 countries and supported by progressive action organizations such as the Sierra Club, Greenpeace and the Earth Day Network. (Thank you Wikipedia.)

Some great, green + fun websites for earth day and beyond:

Buy local foods, support local farms. Visit Local Harvest to find local farms and farmers markets. Go pet a goat and feed some ducks.
Carpool. Check out eRideShare to find local peeps that are looking to share rides. You can even search for someone to carpool across the country with.
Remove yourself from junk mail lists. Check out GreenDimes, sign up to be removed from junk mailings and in turn they’ll send you a dollar, plant a tree on your behalf, or send you a free green ‘zine. Everybody wins! (FYI: When you sign up for this they will ask for credit card information to verify your identity. Sort of like what paypal does. It’s been a few months since I signed up and so far no funny business.)
Once you go black, you never go back… take a walk on the dark side: Blackle is Google powered and eco-friendly.
Recycle your goods and get new ones at freecycle. This site will hook you up with a local group that supports the reuse of anything and everything. Although the site seems a little difficult to navigate, once you’re in there seems to be a lot of activity going on in each of the different areas. There’s a slightly loved television stand in York, PA with your name on it.
Go zero! The Conservation Fund will help you measure your very own carbon emissions and tell you how many trees you need to plant to offset your consumption. I’ve got 16 trees to plant this year to outweigh my emission consumptions. I had better get started. You can do it yourself or they allow you to make a donation for whatever the cost comes out to be to plant your trees.
Get free stuff (by paying for it) at the Sierra Club. Right now, $15 will get you a membership (usually around $35), and a handy backpack for a thank you gift.
Be a green person/dog/baby. I bought my dog these organic treats in the shape of little cupcakes that he refuses to eat from a store I found on Green People. They also have eco friendly and holistic business listings for people too. And their travel section has some really neat stuff.
Save on gas. With gas prices expected to hit $4 this summer, be sure to get your daily feul economy tips for some serious advice on saving money at the gas tank and saving the environment.
Read up. Eco Chick’s blog is as sassy as it is green. And I don’t use the word *sassy* often. Starre Vartan’s website is funny, smart and earth friendly. And how could a girl named Starre not be cool? Be sure to read her list of what not to do for Earth Day. As she says, because mother earth is a woman. Yeah!

It is true, we all need to be a little greener. Without the earth we won’t be here.

April 22 also happens to be the democratic primary in PA, so get out and vote all you registered Pennsylvanians. Polls are open 7am – 8pm, your local polling place is usually within walking distance to your house. Brody and I will be on our way to our designated voting center bright and early wearing our Obama buttons. See you there.Similar articles that might also interest you:

Starbucks is NOT offering free Wi-Fi

Mike Panic — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:51:00 +0000

All over the internet today and even my the front page of the business section of my local paper are articles about Starbucks ditching long-time internet supplier T-Mobile and joining with AT&T to offer free Wi-Fi.

Starbucks plans to offer the new AT&T service initially at 7,000 Starbucks locations in the U.S. It’s available to Starbucks debit card users and Starbucks partners only.

Non-cardholding customers can pay $3.99 for two hours — which, of course, will incent customers to get the debit card. Monthly membership will cost $19.99 per month, and will enable access to AT&T’s 70,000 hot spots in 89 countries.

That quote came from an article titled, Starbucks announces free Wi-Fi. I’m sorry, maybe I’m missing something here, but $19.99 per month for two hours of internet allowance a day or $3.99 for two hours for those of us not in the cool club is not free. As a consumer, I feel that I was misled.

I really wish writers would stick to the facts. There is not a whole lot of difference to the wallet of those who sit in Starbucks and want access to the internet. The only thing changing is who provides it.

I’ve really started to dislike how most drinks from Starbucks taste, but I do like their atmosphere and on occasion have sat there with my laptop and written articles for Randomn3ss or edited photos. I’m lucky though, the Starbucks a few miles from my house is in small strip mall, two doors down is a Panera Bread that offers free Wi-Fi to all customers, just agree to their TOS and deal with them blocking a few sites.

A note to Starbucks:

I, your customers agree to order coffee in those stupid names you give cups instead of small, medium and large. I also agree to pay three and four times the amount for your brown, burned tasting water that you call espresso. I will not agree to pay your bloated price to gain access to the internet when your competition less than 50 feet from you gives it away. Take notes. Similar articles that might also interest you:

MySpace now showing Amber Alerts for your local area

Mike Panic — Thu, 27 Dec 2007 19:21:34 +0000

I just logged into MySpace today to, well to check MySpace out and saw ~~something kind of unusual~~ an Amber Alert. Back in January I told you that MySpace was going to add Amber Alerts, Right above where it says Hello, Mike Panic (once you are logged in, above your default photo on the left) was a link that said,

ATTENTION: There is an Amber Alert in your area.
Please CLICK HERE to find out more information.

Now I’m very aware that MySpace is far from secure and peoples accounts get hacked or taken over on a daily basis, usually due to password phishing, but I know I didn’t login anywhere unusual. Intrigued, I clicked the link and the screenshot to the right came into view. Please note that the screenshot I took is real, those kids are missing, it is not false information.

This is a great thing for MySpace ~~to offer~~ to utilize this system, there are millions of people online daily and hopefully this will bring more attention to child kidnappings. It is sad to see it actually in effect now though.
Offical Amber Alert website: http://www.amberalert.gov/Similar articles that might also interest you:

Gmail is dead in the water

Mike Panic — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:13:30 +0000

As of about 10:50am EST, Google’s web based email Gmail is dead is not responding. What makes it worse is that Google Groups are giving a 500 Internal Server Error when trying to view them. It took more than 10 minutes to get my email to load properly, trying to send a message has resulted in this cryptic message.

Searching Google for this term has proved all but useless, since the first 10 pages of results are links to Google Groups pages, which are dead as well. If someone kicked the plug out of the wall that runs the Gmail & Groups servers, please plug it back in.

Similar articles that might also interest you: